No power exclusion under § 7 paragraph 1 SGB II in application of the European Welfare Agreement
It is often disputed whether EU citizens have a right to Hartz IV benefits under SGB II. As signed, many EU member countries and the European Social Security agreement (EuFürsAbk or EFA), must be constantly reviewed and, if this the case - that is the question of whether an exclusion of benefits is for employable citizens for a stay to look for work - is applicable. This question has not been answered in the case law uniformly and is to be decided by the Federal Social Court in the pending appeal proceedings. The SG
Berlin (26 chamber) has decided in a ruling dated 25/03/2010, that an exclusion of benefits for working age Union citizens to stay to look for work in accordance with § 7 Abs 1 S 2, No 2 SGB 2 shall not apply to nationals of a Contracting State to the European welfare agreement.
SG Berlin, Judgement of 25.03.2010, Az S 26 AS 8114/08
Joachim Genge
lawyer
lawyer specializing in labor law
www.ra-genge.de
Friday, May 7, 2010
Monday, September 7, 2009
Owners Manual Dutchmen Dutchmen
No benefits for the initial equipping of a home if need be eligible education-related and according to the study.
is according to a recent decision by the LSG Berlin-Brandenburg. SGB II § 7 V S.1 not entitled to benefits for the initial equipping of a dwelling such as a bed, wardrobe and kitchen furniture according to § 23 SGB III p.1 No.1 II, when the need is purely educational reasons and not by going beyond particular, in the person lying circumstances such as disability, illness, pregnancy or child-care is limited.
(LSG Berlin-Brandenburg, decision from 06.08.2009, AZ: L 18 AS B 1308/09)
RA Jens Christian Goeke
www.kanzlei-goeke.de
is according to a recent decision by the LSG Berlin-Brandenburg. SGB II § 7 V S.1 not entitled to benefits for the initial equipping of a dwelling such as a bed, wardrobe and kitchen furniture according to § 23 SGB III p.1 No.1 II, when the need is purely educational reasons and not by going beyond particular, in the person lying circumstances such as disability, illness, pregnancy or child-care is limited.
(LSG Berlin-Brandenburg, decision from 06.08.2009, AZ: L 18 AS B 1308/09)
RA Jens Christian Goeke
www.kanzlei-goeke.de
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)