Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Where Do Met Art Get Models From
Following a decision of the Federal Social Court of the basic insurance carrier to cover the replacement of furniture has to pay (in this case a new bed and a new cabinet) if this is necessitated by a move by the basic insurance carrier was himself initiated. Although the wording of this relevant to § 23 III of Book II will cover only the basic equipment of a dwelling, however, replacements are the same way as evaluation standard, when the old furniture not only less well in new home fit but still be functional, but with a move are useless and this move was prompted by the basic security support.
(Federal Social Court, Judgement of 02.07.2009, AZ: B 4 AS 77/08 RLSG Niedersachsen-Bremen, AZ: L 13 AS 518/06SG Oldenburg, AZ: S 45 AS 290/05)
RA Jens-Christian Goeke
http://www.kanzlei-goeke.de/
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Substitute Psyllium For Flour
child benefit as income for children with separated parents
life children alternating with their separated parents, are the children and the parents each have a temporary need community. Child benefit should not be with the children in that time counted as income in proportion, to the other if it is not paid to the need community owned parent, the father here.
The Federal Social Court confirmed this decision, the rulings of lower courts.
If the children are entitled to maintenance claims against the father, it is the responsibility of the defendant Job Centers, these possibly existing maintenance under § 33 SGB II to the Father to be asserted.
SG Freiburg - S 13 AS 6382/05 -
LSG Baden-Württemberg - L 13 AS 2559/08 -
Bundessozialgericht - B 14 AS 75/08 R - Judgement of 02/07/2009
life children alternating with their separated parents, are the children and the parents each have a temporary need community. Child benefit should not be with the children in that time counted as income in proportion, to the other if it is not paid to the need community owned parent, the father here.
The Federal Social Court confirmed this decision, the rulings of lower courts.
If the children are entitled to maintenance claims against the father, it is the responsibility of the defendant Job Centers, these possibly existing maintenance under § 33 SGB II to the Father to be asserted.
SG Freiburg - S 13 AS 6382/05 -
LSG Baden-Württemberg - L 13 AS 2559/08 -
Bundessozialgericht - B 14 AS 75/08 R - Judgement of 02/07/2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)